patching...
Breaking: Police Continue Search for Missing Skippack Man »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Pa. Gov. Tom Corbett Comments on Supreme Court Healthcare Ruling

"Not only is it a tax, but it may turn out to be one of the largest tax increases in the history of our nation," said Corbett.

 
0 of 0
Videos (1)

Videos

Pennsylvania Independent, a public interest journalism project dedicated to open, transparent, and accountable state government, posted to their YouTube channel, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett's remarks today in response to the Supreme Court ruling upholding the Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.

Corbett noted his record opposing the act and assured citizens that his administration would continue to "analyze the decision."

"It is a tax on our citizens that they cannot afford," said Corbett. "It is not good law. It is not good policy."

Corbett conceded that the country was in need of healthcare reform, but asserted that such reforms should come from the individual states.

"I think we can all agree there are Pennsylvanians who need our help," said Corbett. "However, expanding government bureaucracy, government programs and government spending is not the answer."

Hear the full text of Corbett's remarks in the video above.

---

Related Stories

Related Topics: Affordable Care Act, Pennsylvania, gov. tom corbett, harrisburg, and obamacare

Feodor Tiorlenko

7:00 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Corbett's comments are alarmingly irresponsible. The Affordable Care Act is constitutional, that's what happens when five justices find in favor of a law.

Secondly, the individual mandate will drive down the cost of health insurance. Why, because universal coverage reduces risk and guarantees that health care providers will get paid? Today we pay the cost of healthcare for the uninsured and underinsured. That all changes January 1, 2014.

Governor Corbett should be well aware of the savings of hundreds of millions of dollars on health care this act creates. He simply can't get past the partisanship and today's rant was like that of a pouting, petulant child.

Time to move forward the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land.

Don't amuse yourself with repeal of the act. That requires passage by both houses and the signature of the president. Foolishness.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Bartman

8:38 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

So you are perfectly fine with a government program that will be 1/5 of the US economy? That sits perfectly fine with you?

Curmudgeon

7:50 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Feodor: You are a rational person (I assume). How can you provide 30 million uninsured people health coverage for less $$. I know in some ways we are paying now for those people in hospital charges that are relected in insurance premiums, but when the government adds layers and layers of bureaucrats and additonal regulations, there is no way there will be savings. Realistically there will be an explosion of costs adding to our deficits. If the politicians had guts, they would tax us directly, all of us regardless of income. A Federal sales tax that would cover health care, medicare and medicaid. Then we would know what it really costs. These hidden taxes that start next year will even surprise you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tom sawyer

8:29 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

you only assume that you have no evidence of it as i have no evidence it wont happen

tom sawyer

8:27 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I live in Pa. and next to Tom Ridge this clown should be in jail.
He knew about Sandusky from being on the board of directors at Penn State and he also knew from testimony to a grand jury and did nothing. He's a scum bag

Reply

Feodor Tiorlenko

8:29 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects savings in the hundreds of billions of dollars through reduced premium costs, reduced uninsured/underinsured costs, reduced Medicaid/Medicare costs, reduced costs from fewer bankruptcies caused by medical expenses (#1 cause of bankruptcy), and so on.

I don't have the capacity to exceed the capacity of the Congressional Budget Office in calculating these savings, maybe you do.

So if you have data calculations to support your point, you should make them. If you're pushing an idealogical point of view just state that.

By the way, if you don't know this, and you are a resident of Montgomery County, which I assume you are, this county provides for free primary and preventative healthcare for immigrants, including illegal immigrants because ..... it saves lots more money.

When indigents show up for free healthcare the cost is enormous. If you own property but are poor or old, you're screwed. Why because the difference in cost between what healthcare providers are reimbursed by insurance companies and what they charge uninsured is huge.

On average, healthcare providers are reimbursed 23.7% of what their charges are to uninsured. That includes the cost of hospital care, physician care, medication, ancillary care, etc.

That's why I am so happy for the people. You should be too. You're a person too.

Reply

Tom Bartman

8:35 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Obamacare becomes $1.76 trillion tax increase... -- http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/28/obamacare-becomes-obamatax/

Largest tax hiker in history... -- http://freebeacon.com/tax-raiser-in-chief/

I challenge you to find a doctor who supports this disaster of a bill.. Try it...get a name of one doctor who supports it. Considering 83% of doctors consider leaving the industry, there are some out there.

We are a ruled people now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

pruckels

10:01 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Yeah, you'll do a much better job supporting your argument by using citations that are not from extremely partisan sources.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Davis

11:43 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Wow, Tom. You want the name of one doctor who supports it? How about the American Medical Association? http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/357490/20120628/ama-supreme-court.htm

Comment_arrow

Phil Goldstein

7:55 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

This plan is precisely what the Republicans wanted. Romney's program in MA was the model for Obama's ACA, yet now he wants it repealed. And replaced. With what? Who knows because the R's won't specify how they'd change it. Because they wouldn't. They'd repeal it and avoid the issue for another decade. Are you against banning insurers from insuring patients with pre-existing conditions? Against allowing kids up to 26 to remain covered under their parent's policies? Guaranteeing coverage for the uninsured? Who do you think pays for the ER visits of "self-pay" patients? Now that the SCOTUS has ruled ACA constitutional, you and the other right wingers cry foul - that Chief Justice Roberts is a "traitor." Pure hypocrisy. Oh, and by the way Tom, I'm a local doctor in Montgomery County and I support the bill. So, if I read your post correctly, don't assume local docs (and hospitals) don't support this. It's simply the right thing to do. If you're going to take your lead from Corbett, good luck. Remember, he's the guy who wants to give millions in tax breaks to Shell for fracking for natural gas, since he's afraid they'll go elsewhere to drill. Where are they going Tom? New York City? The natural gas is in PA!!! There's no need to offer any tax breaks to them. They'll drill regardless. Millions in tax revenue for PA, but no. Corbett can only complain about the taxes stemming from the ACA. Total hypocrisy.

Comment_arrow

Sugaree

3:49 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012

"Try it...get a name of one doctor who supports it."
Umm, how about the AMA? Ya know the American Medical Society?

Feodor Tiorlenko

9:11 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

You can have your own opinion but not your own facts. Don't give us Fox News or Teaparty website links.

Please!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Bartman

9:16 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Is that what they're teaching at Occupy rallies these days?

Comment_arrow

BT Turner

9:40 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Fe-oder.. not sure who you are directing your comment to... honestly, my "facts" were based on a personal discussion w/ my doctor and my in-laws. Nothing to do w/ cable TV programs, but real-life feedback from real people. Understand son?

Karl

8:31 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

The whole purpose of the law was supposed to provide health care insurance to those that did not have it or could not afford it- some 16-20 million, remember? The SCOTUS struck down the Medicaid mandate which required states to increase their Medicaid rolls exponentially under the threat of the Fed Govt witholding money if they didn't. The end result is states cannot afford to expand Medicaid, so they won't- and those 16-20 million people- mostly poor people- STILL won't have health insurance but will be paying the mandate, er, tax.

So we have a law that does not even do what it was what supposed to do, with a mandate that is suddenly re-branded as a tax- the whole country was decieved by Obama on that, and our power hungry government will be taking over 1/5 of our economy and reducing our freedom of choice.

Outside of that, I guess it's good, right?

Reply

BT Turner

9:18 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

I had my annual physical/checkup about 6 months ago. My doctor told me.. and I quote, "If ObamaCare is passed, my patient volume will at least triple, your scheduled examinations will be delayed by 4-6 months, your costs will sky rocket, and many of my peers (doctors) will leave their practice as their compensation levels will drop as thier patient responsibility wil go through the roof". Honestly, I am not making this up. My in-laws have close friends in Canada. (Seniors) They also state that the time to see a doctor, even in a serious situation, is upwards of 6 months and that bribery (to the tune of $500) will get you to see the doctor sooner. This and the fact that taxes will sky rocket will be detrimental to the USA. Example, a senior who currently pays 15% on dividend income wil see this single tax rise to 49%. Just one (of many) examples of how big government involvment (and waste) will destroy this country. IN my mind, this is so obvious. I feel for the needy, the poor, and I think we are all beyond resolution to our problems... can U say, the beginning of the end?

Reply
Comment_arrow

joe

9:59 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012

Thats bull...i have relatives in Ontario who have no problems with office visits !

Phil Goldstein

11:29 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

If your doctor's patient volume triples, he will do what any good businessman would do. With the increased income, he'll hire at least an additional physician and extra staff, and hopefully still remain profitable. If your exam is delayed 4-6 months, switch doctors. There are many groups that can and will adjust and see you as my group is. With virtually no wait to get an appointment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BT Turner

11:45 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

hey Phil.. I hope your suggestion turns to reality. In theory, it sounds logical and would create jobs.. which is what we need. I think the issue is that the # of doctors today is already limited (have u tried scheduling a routine visit lately? mine are at least 6-8 weeks out) My son is looking to be an Opthamologist -- a specialist in medical and surgical eye problems. He already has concerns pursuing this as a career knowing that malpractice premiums are greater than half their salary and now, the overload of patients - really has him skeptical. Hopefully, your group becomes the norm -- seeing patients w//virtually no wait. That's awesome. Maybe I need to switch away from Main Line Health (in Collegeville) over to your group. What is your groups name?

Phil Goldstein

8:00 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012

BT - I left you a personal note. Our pediatric group can get your children in for routine visits in well under 6-8 weeks. Best of luck to your son - I have a budding pediatrician in his residency, who has similar concerns as does your son. Malpractice rates in SE PA are particularly high.

Reply

BT Turner

8:14 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012

Phil - thanks. Appreciate your info.

Reply

Leave a comment