patching...
Breaking: Police Searching for Missing College Student From Skippack »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Instagram Clarifies Photo Policy After Backlash

The photo-sharing service will change its policy effective January 16, 2013.

 

UPDATE:

Instagram issued a statement this afternoon following a huge public outcry over its policy changes.

The statement was in part a mea culpa, as Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom admitted that the company made mistakes with the language of the new terms. 

"Since making these changes, we’ve heard loud and clear that many users are confused and upset about what the changes mean," Systrom wrote.

However, Systrom pointed out that some of the confusion over the new terms was due to incorrect interpretation of the terms.

"Instagram users own their photos," Systrom wrote. "Instagram does not claim any ownership rights over your photos. Nothing about this has changed."

Systrom praised the user community for its quick feedback.

"I am grateful to everyone for their feedback and that we have a community that cares so much. We need to be clear about changes we make — this is our responsibility to you," he wrote.

Read Instagram's full statement on the backlash here

 

Earlier story:

Users of the photo-filtering and -sharing site Instagram are facing a decision to either delete their accounts or allow Instagram to sell their photos.

According to a CNET article, this policy change gives Instagram the right to take photos posted by users to the site and sell them to anyone, without asking the user for permission or compensating them for the use of the picture.

The Terms of Service says:

Some or all of the Service may be supported by advertising revenue. To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.

The article uses the example of vacation photos to illustrate.

Let's say you go to a hotel in Hawaii on vacation, and while you're there you Instagram photos of yourself lounging by the pool, having dinner in the hotel restaurant or drinks at the bar. The hotel could purchase your pictures from Instagram and use them in their advertising without your input.

The only way to opt out of the new terms is to delete your Instagram account. There are services such as Instaport (recommended by Wired magazine) that will let you download your Instagram photos into a ZIP file. 

If you choose to close your Instagram account, you must do so by Jan. 16, 2013. Any accounts still open on that date will automatically fall under the new terms of service, even if you delete your account after that date. 

Related Topics: Instagram and Instagram photos

John Scioli

1:58 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Seriously who gives a doo doo ? I like Instagram I take half assed pictures with my phone with a lens that's usually smudged . Heck if they sell my pictures perhaps it will bring me some recognition . Who knows ?, What really gets photographed that is all that important its of it is peoples cats and pics of their ugly kids. Or what you had to eat . Or some ugly broad making pouty face with a bowel movement in the toilet . Big deal . Sell my pictures. I don't care . I use it as a marketing tool for by businesses. It worksi won't be deleting my account.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Keith Heffintrayer

8:04 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

For the sake of argument: Say one of your friends posted a photo of you via Instagram, and that photo was later purchased by a company for use in an advertisement which you're opposed. Would that change your mind?

Say you hate guns, and Instagram sold your photo to be the spokesman of the NRA. Would that be ok? (aside from the obvious enjoyment of becoming a de facto celebrity!)

Roy Martin

5:09 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Come on, Patch this isn't news! There must be some good auto crash somewhere...Or some local DUI bust...

Reply

John Scioli

8:30 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

While it may be legal to sell a photo it is quite another story to have your likeness or image used for further profit or economic gain as a spokesperson or otherwise.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Keith Heffintrayer

9:11 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Under the original plan (prior to the backlash), Instagram would have been able to do things, such as stamp your photo on all correspondence, etc.

Reply

Leave a comment